Pinakinvox is based in New Delhi. A focused MVP is ₹1.5–4 lakhs over 6–10 weeks. When Figma is already signed off, engineering, QA, and launch typically fit 4–8 weeks on React Native, Flutter, Node.js, or Next.js — one core workflow, analytics from day one, repository you own.
Pinakinvox is an MVP development company based in New Delhi. A focused MVP is ₹1.5–4 lakhs over 6–10 weeks: one core workflow, auth, a backend API, and a web or mobile front end. When Figma is already signed off, engineering, QA, and launch typically fit a 4–8 week window on React Native, Flutter, Node.js, or Next.js. We cut features that do not test the hypothesis. Itemised quote within 24 hours.
Pinakinvox focused MVP — one end-to-end user journey, basic auth, backend API, and mobile or web frontend. 6–10 weeks including design; 4–8 weeks of engineering-to-launch when Figma is already approved
Source: Pinakinvox MVP packagesRead our analysis →Signed scope to production — Figma in weeks 1–2 if needed, 2-week engineering sprints, then QA and launch. Skip the design block and the remaining work is typically 4–8 weeks
Source: Pinakinvox delivery modelRead our analysis →Typical saving shipping iOS and Android from one React Native or Flutter codebase versus funding two native builds — the usual stack choice for a first store listing
Source: Digiflute: Mobile App Development Cost in India 2026Read our analysis →| Feature area | Include in MVP | Leave for V2 |
|---|---|---|
| Core workflow | One end-to-end user journey — working, tested, deployed | Secondary workflows and edge-case handling |
| Auth | Email + password or Google SSO | SSO with enterprise SAML, 2FA, role hierarchies |
| Payments | One payment method (Stripe or Razorpay) only if willingness to pay is the hypothesis | Multiple gateways, subscriptions, invoicing, refunds |
| Notifications | Email only — transactional confirmations | Push, SMS, in-app notification centre |
| Admin / analytics | Event analytics from day one; a basic user list if you need it | Full analytics suite, cohort analysis, bespoke admin panels |
A good MVP partner builds fast and says no. Every feature added before user validation is a bet without data. The MVP’s only job is to get you that data — then you decide what version two is worth.
The greatest risk for any startup is building a product nobody wants. From New Delhi we run Lean Engineering so the core value proposition ships first — then you learn from real users before you fund version two.
Building to validate your most critical business logic.
2-week sprints to keep the product moving at startup speed.
Clean, documented codebases for technical due diligence.
Architecture that supports your first pivot, Seed raise, or Series A.
"Success is about the speed of your technical learning loops. We build the high-performance prototypes that allow founders in India and globally to find product-market fit without wasting time or capital."
Specialized product engineering for brands that value speed, validation, and technical mastery.
Expert guidance on feature prioritization and defining your core MVP set.
High-fidelity interactive mockups to visualize the product before engineering.
Rapidly building the core engine of your product for a high-velocity launch.
Ensuring your architecture meets the standards expected by VC auditors.
Integrating event tracking (PostHog/Amplitude) to measure user behavior.
Handling hosting, domain setup, and initial beta-user onboarding and scaling.
Functional UI tests to validate business logic with real target global users.
Ongoing performance monitoring and feature iteration as you gain market traction.
Nearly every founder who approaches us has scoped version two and called it version one. Cutting features is the highest-leverage thing we do for you, because every feature you postpone is runway you keep. Here is where we push back, and where we refuse to compromise.
| Feature | Version one? | Reasoning |
|---|---|---|
| Event analytics | Include | Non-negotiable. An MVP with no instrumentation cannot answer the question you built it to answer. PostHog or Amplitude, wired up before launch. |
| Payments | Depends | Include only if willingness to pay is the hypothesis you are testing. If it is not, a manual invoice for your first customers is faster and tells you the same thing. |
| Authentication | Include | Needed, but keep it boring. An email magic link ships in a day; full social login across Google, Apple, and Facebook can absorb a week for little early learning. |
| Custom admin dashboard | Cut it | For your first hundred users, the database GUI or a Retool screen does the job. A bespoke internal panel is often 20% of an MVP budget spent on a screen only you will see. |
| Push notifications | Cut it | Store review cycles, permission prompts, and device testing make this deceptively expensive. Email covers re-engagement until you know what is worth notifying people about. |
| Multi-language support | Cut it | Every string becomes a translation dependency and every layout needs re-testing. Launch in one language, add locales once a market is proven. |
| Granular role permissions | Cut it | Admin and user is almost always enough at launch. Fine-grained permission matrices are a common source of bugs and rarely used by early adopters. |
| In-app chat and onboarding tours | Cut it | Talk to your first users directly over WhatsApp or a call. You will learn more from ten conversations than from a tooltip walkthrough, and it costs nothing to build. |
If this feature did not exist, would the MVP still answer the question you are building it to answer? If yes, it waits for version two. A ₹4 lakh MVP that ships in eight weeks and proves demand is worth considerably more than a ₹12 lakh build that ships in six months and proves the same thing — you paid three times as much for four months of delay.
A high-velocity, phase-based approach to building world-class product MVPs.
Week 1: lock the hypothesis, the one workflow, and the launch date. Features that do not test the bet wait.
Weeks 1–2 if you need design. Frozen Figma skips this block and shortens the remaining work to 4–8 weeks.
2-week sprints on React Native, Flutter, Node.js, or Next.js — functional builds, not status decks.
Production deploy, store submission when it is a mobile MVP, and event tracking so the first users produce data.
React Native or Flutter for mobile, Next.js for web, Node.js and PostgreSQL underneath.
iOS + Android
Pixel-matched UI
API and auth
Web MVP
A focused MVP is 6–10 weeks from signed scope, including Figma if we design it. When screens are already approved, engineering, QA, and launch typically fit 4–8 weeks. Native-only or payments-plus-admin work is a longer rung — we will say so before you sign.
Cross-platform React Native or Flutter for most first launches, so iOS and Android come from one codebase. Native Swift or Kotlin only when the product depends on deep device APIs. A web MVP uses Next.js. We pick the stack on the scoping call against the hypothesis you are testing, not against a preferred framework.
Yes. Signed, frozen screens skip the design block and put you on the 4–8 week engineering-to-launch path. Screens that still change weekly are not frozen — we treat those as a 6–10 weeks design-and-build. Delhi NCR founders who need a Play Store date should read the Delhi NCR MVP page, which is written around that calendar.
We build scalable MVPs. Using modern, enterprise-ready stacks like Next.js and PostgreSQL means your technical foundation is solid, so while new features will inevitably be added, you will not need a total architectural rewrite when you reach your first 10,000 users. We are honest about the trade-off: an MVP is deliberately not built for a million users, because architecting for scale you do not have yet is the most common way founders burn their runway before validating anything.
We use a rigorous 'Value vs. Technical Complexity' framework. We help you identify the 20% of features that provide 80% of the value to your early adopters, ensuring your startup budget is invested only in what actually validates your core business idea.
Yes — unless you already have signed Figma. Then we review and freeze screens and start sprints. New work still gets high-fidelity UI for the core journey so early users and investors see a real product, not a wireframe.
Yes, and the parts investors actually check are the ones we take seriously: a codebase a technical due-diligence reviewer can read, no hardcoded secrets, a design system rather than ad-hoc screens, and analytics wired up so you can show real usage instead of opinions. Worth being blunt about what a build cannot do — no agency can promise you funding, and traction data from real users will persuade an investor far more than the polish of the product itself.
A focused, well-scoped MVP typically runs ₹1.5–4 lakhs over 6–10 weeks — one platform, the core flow only, and analytics from day one. A product MVP with accounts and billing is ₹6–12 lakhs over 10–14 weeks. If your estimate is coming back above that, the usual cause is scope that belongs in version two rather than version one; the scope table above shows what we cut and why. You get line-item pricing within 24 hours of a scoping call.
That is a successful MVP, not a failed one — finding out early is the entire point. Because you own the repository from the first commit and we keep the data model separate from the interface, a pivot usually reuses the authentication, billing, and infrastructure layers and rewrites the product surface. In practice that means a pivot costs a fraction of the original build rather than starting over. If validation says stop, you stop having spent ₹2 lakhs instead of ₹20 lakhs.